9.00 x 16 tires

Message
Author
just1rovernut

9.00 x 16 tires

#1 Post by just1rovernut » Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:59 pm

Anyone know if 9.00 x 16 tires can fit a stock 11a rim and will they fit the wheel wells of a 109? I'm told by fairey that an overdrive is pointless with the weight of our amby and I'm concerned about driveline failure (off the road) in my attempt for lower highway revs. The larger tire will give a reasonable rpm change (not going for increased speed because of wind drag) not to mention I wouldn't mind the added clearence. Any advice would be appreciated.
Drew from salmo.

HeadDamage
Horn Blower
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:21 pm
Location: Calgary

#2 Post by HeadDamage » Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:14 pm

If you want to put bigger tires on your best bet is likely to get some wolf or 130 rims (both are the same dimensions at 6.5x16) and fit 255/85R16 tires. You would also need these rims to fit 900x16 tires if you can find them. You could also consider fitting 3.54 diff gears in place of your 4.7 ones but this might over gear you too much.

just1rovernut

#3 Post by just1rovernut » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:14 pm

If I understand you they would fit the wheel wells? The rear axles' a salisbury and if I went with gearing would I need a special diff to hold the gears? Thanks for the info on the rims. With larger wheels my biggest concern is that steering radius isn't going to be a problem.

DaveB
Defender of the World
Posts: 1749
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 7:45 pm
Location: Vernon, BC

#4 Post by DaveB » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:27 pm

I think they'll fit the wheel wells on your 109 — in the front, but may rub during articulation while steering is in any position but straight ahead, and you would have to adjust your steering stops as they'll definitely rub the frame during tight turns, even if you use the significantly outset wolf wheels.

I'm not sure in the back with the ambulance body, but if I recall correctly, there's a fair bit of clearance under there.

255/85R16 is the size of tire I run on my IIa, but I did a fair bit of fender trimming to ensure they didn't rub under full articulation. I also moved the spring hangers downward to increase the height by 2" — something that has already been done at the factory on the ambulance... as a result you may be able to get away with it if you're keeping the truck on basic trails and gravel and aren't planning to get into situations of high articulation.

Dave

HeadDamage
Horn Blower
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:21 pm
Location: Calgary

#5 Post by HeadDamage » Thu Feb 21, 2008 5:56 pm

The wolf/130 rims have the same back space as the 5.5" 109/110 rims, but they are 1" wider on the out side.

just1rovernut

#6 Post by just1rovernut » Thu Feb 21, 2008 8:37 pm

basic trails and gravel, that cuts straight to my aluminum steel heart dave. It's true I don't wish to thrash it (which would be easy to due as it is HEAVY). I need to be able to cruise a little better than now though or I'll never get to any events without shipping the darn thing. Headdamage and yourself have got me thinking that maybe I need to shoot for middle of the road in my goals here due to the limitations in choices I have. Cutting metal is out of the question. I see from reading some threads that michelin makes a tire xzl 8.25x16 with steel sidewalls. If the threads right they're 33.8 diameter. 3.5 inches more than present. I figure around a 10 percent increase in road speed (or lower rpm) so instead of 4000 I'd be reving 3400 rpm. I may go with this route. If I spend money on tires instead of a overdrive so be it. Any thoughts?

HeadDamage
Horn Blower
Posts: 574
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2004 3:21 pm
Location: Calgary

#7 Post by HeadDamage » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:26 pm

For your use I'd look at the Toyo M55 in 255/85R16 mounted on wolf rims or maybe the BFG MT in the same size and on the wolf rims. The 8.25x16 XZL is crazy expensive, hard to get, and wears out fast on the hwy.

rick.m

weels and tires.

#8 Post by rick.m » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:36 am

I have wolfe wheels on my 109. and run 235/85 r 16.s. almost 33 in tires. and it is a sweet ride, i have parabolics, from PAUL HYSTE IN HOLLAND, and military shackles. , i am running a 1.5 in alum, spacer, , and power steering.[scout]. it rolls along fine, i have a 10 ply tire so it stands tall for the road, and no metal is trimmed, all the best, rick.m, must weigh the rig so i can know the weight, it is laoded all the time, .and i have a new FAIREY IN now as well,. rick.m. let me know if you would like a few pics,

just1rovernut

#9 Post by just1rovernut » Fri Feb 22, 2008 10:40 pm

You've all been a great help. I'm going to go the tire route for sure now. It's the simplest and least intrusive and should look sweeeet. Next stop, shopping for rims and tires. Thanks again.
Drew from salmo

shawn doherty
Wrecker Bait
Posts: 212
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2004 7:09 pm
Location: Kingfisher BC

#10 Post by shawn doherty » Sat Feb 23, 2008 11:26 am

I run 255 85 16 BFG MT on my stock MOD 109 I have had this for the last 60,000 K the truck is used mostly off road and has rubbed on full articulation a few times but did not cause me any concern.

just1rovernut

#11 Post by just1rovernut » Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:53 pm

just found this tonight on my hunt. Great examples of it being done allready with the 255 85 16s. Really set me at ease regarding clearence. Interesting axle change out too.(blasphemy)

just1rovernut

#12 Post by just1rovernut » Sat Feb 23, 2008 7:54 pm

woops. sorry. just found this tonight on my hunt. Great examples of it being done allready with the 255 85 16s. Really set me at ease regarding clearence. Interesting axle change out too.(blasphemy)http://landrover109.blogspot.com/

just1rovernut

#13 Post by just1rovernut » Tue Mar 18, 2008 7:32 pm

At a website called maple leaf up theres a link to another tire brand. They say there's a 9 x 16 tire designed for a 6 inch rim (which I have) with a 0 bead angle if anyones interested. Apparently the issue is usually with split rims and the bead not sitting flat if the rims too narrow?

John
Cylinder bore
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 8:37 pm
Location: Langley, BC

#14 Post by John » Wed Mar 19, 2008 8:13 am

Are you still considering a 9.00x16 for your ambulance? Do lots of research. From what I recall a typical 9.00x16 is somewhere around 35" tall. You'll be looking at extended shackles at the least and lower gearing than I think came standard in the ambulances.

red90
Defender of the World
Posts: 1509
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 7:19 pm
Location: Calgary

#15 Post by red90 » Wed Mar 19, 2008 9:13 am

John wrote:...From what I recall a typical 9.00x16 is somewhere around 35" tall.....
For whatever strange reason, I happen to have a copy of the British Tyre standard. I put together a page with the sizing information for British tyre sizes, which may be of use.

http://members.shaw.ca/jbarge/britishtires.html

Post Reply